Carepe Diem

' 모든 것은 죽어 없어지리라. 모든 것이 무로 돌아가리라. 생명을 주관하는 자는 암흑의 혹성 저 너머로 마지막 태양의 마지막 빛까지도 불사르리라. 오직 나의 고통만이 더욱 가혹하다 나는 서 있다, 불속에 휘감긴 채로, 상상도 못할 사랑의 끌 수 없는 커다란 불길 위에.' 탄환은 심장을 동경한다! Mayakovskii, Vladimir V.;Маяковский, Владимир, 대중의 취향에 따귀를 때려라...

2021. 5. 28.

한국사회적기업진흥원

https://www.socialenterprise.or.kr/index.do#m_home

(13292) 경기도 성남시 수정구 수정로 157 새마을금고빌딩 (6~8층) Tel. 031-697-7700 Fax. 031-697-7889
CopyrightⓒKorea Social Enterprise Promotion Agency. All Contents Reserved

지방출자출연기관 설립현황

https://www.cleaneye.go.kr/siteGuide/iptCompStatus.do

2021. 5. 22.

국립문화재연구소 문화유산 연구지식포탈 - 어메이징,멋쪄요...

https://portal.nrich.go.kr/kor/diaryList.do?menuIdx=1035

2021. 5. 21.

Methods of Environmental and Social Impact Assessment

서울 도시계획 포털, 지도서비스... 쥑이네요...ㅋ

https://urban.seoul.go.kr/view/map/main.html

서울경관아카이브

https://urban.seoul.go.kr/cityscape

2021. 5. 19.

World Heritage Review - People protecting World Heritage

https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000376960?fbclid=IwAR0HvtuFXqgCOw0Q-H6gnEebhxUUMLqnecSAWGthGZ7Tq_zDM3gG53s_Fko

Article on the World Heritage Leadership Programme in the most recent World Heritage Review - People protecting World Heritage

Capacity-building: supporting the people to protect the heritage (pages 58-61)

Enjoy!!!

‘사랑의열매회관’(김수근과공간건축,1978), ‘조선일보미술관(원도시건축,1988),

https://blog.naver.com/archur/220283155844

건축자산 지도

http://www.aurum.re.kr/Bits/BuildingKakaoMap

2011년 역사도시경관 권고 이행에 관한 가입국간 2차 협의(2019년) 보고서 결론 부분

19 - Conclusions

76. While the number of Member States responding to the Survey was 55, reporting from the Group III, IV, Va and Vb need to be significantly higher to understand the accomplishments and challenges in those regions and better support them.

77. The Recommendation is more relevant today than ever as cities and their heritage continue to face a number of complex global challenges and seek sustainability, inclusion, and resilience. The HUL approach is a tool to manage change in historic urban areas facing current global challenges.

78. The data shows that there has been some progress made in implementing key concepts of the Recommendation, yet much remains to be done. Member States reflected that although the survey addressed national/federal authorities, the information requested was targeted to the local governments. Therefore, in implementation of the HUL approach, it is crucial to establish links between national/federal and local level decision makers at the country level.

79. There is also a need to re-emphasize that the Recommendation addresses historic urban areas in UNESCO Member States beyond those on the World Heritage List.

80. It is important to implement the HUL approach when working directly with cities and towns to support implementation at the local level

81. The majority of the responding Member States reported that they have implemented eco-sensitive policies. The contribution of nature in regards to quality of life, urban heritage and climate adaptation, existing cooperation among Advisory Bodies should be further enhanced to develop an integrated programmatic approach.

82. It is also valuable to reinforce integration with the 2030 Agenda, Goal 11 in particular, and the New Urban Agenda by supporting long term resilience and recovery in the context of climate related disasters and mitigate the impacts of conflicts on urban areas with heritage;

83. The Recommendation must be implemented as an urgent and necessary tool for resolving the conflicting demands of heritage conservation and urban development for more sustainable cities – in those cities that have properties inscribed on the World Heritage List as well as those that do not. This demands establishing a programmatic approach to developing guidance materials, tools, and capacity building to prioritize needs.

84. The dissemination of international good practices on HUL approach is required; nonetheless, it is reported to be limited. The research as well as guidance materials that have already been completed and developed should be disseminated and the experiences of cities shared. A platform of exchange for cities would be valuable to share knowledge, good practices, and experiences.

85. The majority of the responding Member States reported that they have given importance to intangible cultural heritage through the UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage (2003). The contribution of the associated intangible cultural heritage should be better integrated in the urban development.

86. The reporting indicates a need to explore innovative partnerships between local, national, international agencies, UN programmes, development cooperation agencies, communities, and private sector as well as a need to explore innovative financial mechanisms including partnerships to enable better implementation of United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, and the New Urban Agenda.

87. Although the World Heritage Programme provides relevant data on outstanding historic urban areas for monitoring purposes, other monitoring mechanisms are necessary to support cities in monitoring and assessing their implementation of the Recommendation particularly in the context of the SDGs.

88. The overall highest number of positive replies were received on “policies that link culture to urban development” and on “innovative tourism activities available for historic urban areas” in Section I (89.1%) indicating that UNESCO was successful in integrating culture in development policies.

89. Although the majority of the responding Member States referred that they were working on their National Urban Policies, the overall lowest number of positive replies were received on “National Urban Forum of NGOs” in Section I (29.1%) which requires further attention of Member States in localising the integration of HUL approach at the local level.

90. The data shows that the majority of the impact assessments are in the form of Environmental Assessments (EIA). Therefore integrating heritage impact assessment within the EIA as well as other tools for assessing the impact of projects are necessary.

91. Educational programmes are limited for young professionals, therefore capacity building is necessary across regions and between diverse stakeholders including local authorities and communities. Better harnessing of digital technologies concerning urban heritage to reach out to youth and other under-represented groups should be examined.

92. The participation of local communities is reported to be limited, therefore more tools and methodologies are necessary for the systematic engagement of local communities in decision-making processes.

2021. 5. 18.

『한국학종합정보서비스』 (RINKS : Research Information Network of Korean Studies)

http://rinks.aks.ac.kr/?rowNum=10

『한국학종합정보서비스』 (RINKS : Research Information Network of Korean Studies)

한국학 분야의 학술 연구 성과와 동향 정보를 체계적으로 수집, 분석, 정리하고 연구자와 일반인 모두 쉽게 활용할 수 있게 함으로써 연구 성과의 학제적 소통과 연구 생산성의 증진을 도모하고 있습니다. 현재 국내외 한국학 관련 연구 기관들이 보유한 학술 자원, 논문 및 단행본, 멀티미디어 자료 등의 연구 성과와 연구자 정보를 종합적으로 제공하여 모든 한국학 정보를 한 곳에서 검색하고 이용할 수 있는 “세계 한국학 연구 포털”을 지향하고 있는 시스템입니다.

https://db.itkc.or.kr/people/#

본 서비스는 한국고전종합DB의 한국문집총간 해제, 고전번역서 각주정보, 고전용어 시소러스, 한국문집총간 편목색인 등에서 인물정보를 추출하여 관계의 속성을 중심으로 정리한 자료로서 한국고전종합DB 내 흩어져있는 인물정보를 보다 효율적이고 입체적으로 검색, 열람, 활용할 수 있도록 기획한 베타 서비스입니다.

표제인물의 기본정보 및 관계정보는 출처를 기반으로 추출ㆍ정리한 자료로서 출처 정보의 작성 시기와 작성자에 따라 일부 정보의 경우 오류가 있을 수 있습니다.